should athletes be paid?

by Prez Ro 

Feel free to add share this article...

| More



Coming out of the NCAA basketball tournaments, commonly known as March Madness, did you see an empty gym? What about the bowl games - any empty seats there? So let's forget about the game-winning shot... forget about the game winning touchdown... and definitely forget the pageantry... What about the hard earned money college athletes will never see and earned?

In the world of college sports, its win or go home, and to the winners go the spoils. Most successful college sports teams rake in millions of dollars in revenue. Steve Spurrier, the coach for the Florida Gators signed a six year contract where he would make a little over 2.5 million dollars a year not including certain benefits like a free car for his wife. Some coaches even have in their contracts use of a private jet.
So with the institutions and coaches getting rich off their players, why can't a student-athlete make a few bucks? Most college athletes get around $200-250 dollars a month for living expenses and spending money, this is very small compared to a student who has time to actually work. Some people say that athletes get paid by having a scholarship, but if you look at the ulterior motive behind scholarships, I think people would change their minds on that one.   Example of a typical working college student:
30 hours a week Practice / Video
x
minimum wage (7.25) plus $2 (9.25)
plus game day time (3 hours)
equals 305.25 a week (or $1221 a month)
icon
At the very least, a stipend needs to be setup for athletes which will encourage them to stay in school. For example, those who finish three years get a certain amount and those that complete all four and graduate get a certain amount (larger than three years of course).

Many have come forward with solutions, including passed players and even politicians.
Jalen Rose solution
Jason Whitlock...
Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel

• Former Florida State player and Rhodes Scholar Myron Rolle (Tennessee Titans)
Ralph Nadar...

Coaches try to get players who they think have the talent to make them win and to persuade them to come to their school and from this they dangle a carrot called a scholarship. So the whole idea behind a scholarship is to lure a student to come to your school. Scholarships are just a recruitment tactic. Don’t confuse what I am saying, I don’t think college players should be making millions of dollars, but there should be a set wage for all players no matter if they make the highlights everyday or ride the pine. Every player of a college sport puts in countless man-hours of work to their sport instead of going out and getting a job they have to devote all their time to this. So ask yourself, how did Louisville decide that coach Rick Pitino is going to be worth the amount they paid him? In addition, since this is amateur sports right?

"It's like a job. We get up early, work out, meetings, class and practice," Ron Brace said. "We're giving up a big chunk of our life. I see no reason we shouldn't be paid."Ron Pace played football for Boston College.

Now the other side of the coin is should players have the right to their likenesses? If you go to a bookstore in Utah you would probably find a Jimmer Fredette jersey for sale for about one-hundred-and-fifty dollars. Now even though it has his name on it and his number NONE of the money that was used to purchase the jersey will ever see Fredette's pockets. That money usually goes to many departments including the Dean of the School, but none of the money goes to the athletic department. Ironic huh? Not to mention players likeness appearing in electronic format such as video games.

In January 2008, the NCAA settled an antitrust lawsuit filed by four former student-athletes and agreed to set aside $218 million through 2011-12 to help the more than 150,000 Division I athletes in all sports pay for basic expenses not covered by their athletic scholarships. Plus it makes no sense for an athlete to be worth thousands of dollars to a school and his family is about to be evicted from their apartment.

The NCAA has banned college players from receiving extra benefits from ANYBODY.

NOTE: Be sure to take our poll below, or click here.

Recently, the NCAA has begun to re-think their decision on this subject with players and college getting caught all the time for giving and receiving extra benefits. Thus,  the NCAA are starting to think about reforming their laws especially based on OHIO STATE's current issue. It is detrimental to both the school’s name and the player’s for being caught for extra benefit scandals. Some people say that there is too much under the table payment going on to enforce anyways. If the athletes got what they deserved and got paid to play, this would not be an issue. Paying athletes to play should be legal, they put too much time into it not to get paid. So while the coaches get paid more than the President of the United States, does players sit back and have to be content with the sweat off their back as payment. Think about it, without the players, coaches would not get paid as much as they do - nobody goes to see a college game to see the coach in action, they go to see the players. Nobody turns on the television to see how well the coach will react in a game - they watch it to see their team, their players in action. So there is much conflict in the world of college sports about where the money should go.

Should it all go to the schools and coaches? Or should the players that make the games possible, and make the coaches salaries, get a cut of the revenue also? This is a question that will go unanswered until somebody let's go of the old, traditional thinking, and take a stand against the corrupt underbelly of college sports.

So to answer the question of whether or not a player should be paid or not? In my opinion, ABSOLUTELY!!! So never mind the game-winning shot... the game winning touchdown... it's time for some new tradition! It's time to pay these athletes and acknowledge what everyone knows to be true - that major college sports is nothing more than minor league pro sports?

  FACTS
Paying athletes is a topic that won't go away because there is seemingly so much money to be had. Consider:

• At least 68 of 119 Division I football coaches have contracts for at least $1 million, according to coacheshotseat.com. Seven coaches in the SEC, including Georgia's Mark Richt, make at least $2 million. Seven in the ACC, including Tech's Paul Johnson, make at least $1.5 million. To compare, only five coaches in the nation earned as much as $1 million in 1999, according to USA Today.

• CBS is paying the NCAA $6 billion over 11 years to televise its three-week postseason basketball tournament.

• On April 22, 2010, a monumental 14 year 10.8 billion dollar agreement was reached with Turner to receive joint broadcast rights along with CBS for the NCAA 'March Madness' college basketball tournament.


• The Big Ten and Mountain West conferences have launched their own TV networks, which are projected to generate millions of dollars.

• Texas and ESPN inked a deal worth $300 million. Texas would receive $247.5 million of the guarantee by ESPN with the rest going to IMG College, a company that provides marketing and licensing services for the university. The school could also receive more money based on the amount of profit from the network, which is set to begin airing this fall. The revenue is in addition to the expected $14 to $15 million Texas is expected to receive from the Big 12


• Nike and Reebok, among others, negotiate million-dollar deals with colleges for the players to wear their apparel. Georgia receives $1.3 million a year from Nike, as part of a 10-year deal signed in 1999. Tech has deals with various companies, depending upon the sport. In 2006, those deals were worth about $325,000. Tech will announce a new deal with Russell in August that will cover most of its teams, according to assistant athletics director Dean Buchan

• Bowl payouts - click here

• Final Four payouts

How about coaches work with out these lucrative contracts and receive a simple stipend, like the players, which includes housing, all of their utilities, access to education via the institution they are coaching at and commission upon 'X' amount of victories and bowl games? I bet they would change their minds on athletes ability to make money then...

I don't think you take the larger mission of college athletics and toss the whole thing out the window. For most athletes -- most of them are truly student-athletes -- the current approach works beautifully. There are a lot of Matt Howards out there, although most fall short of his grade-point average. We focus on the revenue-producing programs, like the ones we're watching in this NCAA Tournament, and completely ignore the majority of student-athletes who are, in fact, student-athletes.

We don't need a revolution, but we need a new way of looking at an age-old problem. I'm sick and tired of the NCAA and its member schools who operate as a business, then claim it's not a business when it's convenient to their bottom line and hide behind non-profit status. Name another non-profit organization that makes ranks in $17 million dollars for one event a year?

NOTE: The four (4) nonprofits that run the bowls took in nearly $28 million in revenue in 2009

NOTE: We are proud to announce that for the entire month of February, S.C. Fitch Enterprises, and all of its affiliates including Amateur Sports News Network, ASNN365.com, and Amateur Sports Gallery will be honoring April as National Autism Awareness Month®.  Autism is a complex developmental disability that typically appears during the first three years of life and affects a person’s ability to communicate and interact with others. Click here for more information.

Here is your opportunity to stop hating the media and actually become it!

We are always looking for additional personnel. Click here if you are interested. If you would like to submit a story, score, stats, or even photos, click here.


FOLLOW US...